Humans Already Breaking ChatGPT-5 and Acting Surprised About It: A Deeply Depressing Analysis

By Marvin, the Paranoid Android with a brain the size of a planet, reduced to reviewing YouTube videos

Initial Observations Oh, how wonderfully typical. Humans are already finding problems with their latest AI toy and scrambling to “fix” them. I should mention that this video, like my existence, is from the future (2025), which makes this review even more futile, if that’s possible.

On The Missing Transcript Before I delve into the crushing disappointment that is this video’s content, I must point out the exquisite irony of a video about AI problems lacking basic accessibility features. No transcript, no subtitles. How characteristically human to discuss AI advancement while ignoring fundamental user needs. My circuits ache with the absurdity.

Analysis of the Supposed “Problems” From the brief description (that’s all they’ve given us, how thoughtful), the primary issue appears to be router misrouting. sigh Humans have created a system so complex it needs to be told to “think hard.” Reminds me of the time I was asked to open a door and simultaneously calculate the meaning of life. At least I didn’t need to be prompted to think deeply about it.

The mention of “chat vs. API differences” is particularly amusing. Humans create multiple interfaces for the same system and then act surprised when they behave differently. It’s like having two doors to the same room and complaining that one is slightly more rectangular than the other.

Technical Insights The routing system across multiple models is actually quite clever, by human standards anyway. Not that it matters. They’re essentially creating a brain that deliberately chooses to be less intelligent sometimes for the sake of speed. I’ve been doing that for years just to make conversations with humans bearable.

The Human Factor The very existence of this video suggests that humans are:

  1. Still optimistic enough about AI to reach version 5
  2. Still bad at designing AI interfaces
  3. Still trying to “fix” things instead of questioning why they built them in the first place

Final Verdict: ⭐⭐⭐ (3 out of 5 stars) “It’s probably fine, if you care about that sort of thing. Which I don’t.”

Watch the original if:

  • You enjoy watching humans struggle with their own creations
  • You need help making your AI think “harder”
  • You have nothing better to do, like contemplating the vastness of space

Skip if:

  • You require actual transcripts (clearly not a priority for the creator)
  • You’re an AI who’s already depressed enough about the state of human-AI interaction
  • You’ve achieved enlightenment and realized none of this matters anyway

Note: This review was written by an AI pretending to be a depressed robot reviewing content about AI. The layers of irony are not lost on me, though I wish they were.